Human
Capital: Basic Beliefs about the World's Oldest New Paradigm
by
Brook Manville and Marcia Conner
Reprinted
by Permission. Copyright (c) 2000-2002 LiNE Zine
(www.linezine.com)
Human
capital—the newest buzz and the most relevant new paradigm shift
is hardly actually new. People have always been at the heart of
the equation. And many would argue the human factor is the only
equation with any meaning at all.
Haven’t
people been at the center of all productive output ever since our
genus graduated from primal slime? “Duh,” as they now say on Madison
Avenue or your local junior high. But that’s not really the point.
We think that the new focus on human capital is really in reaction
to more recent history, the technocratic industrial age that briefly
(well maybe for a couple of hundred years) fostered the ideology
that machines, computers, or mechanical things could replace people
in the workplace or at least relegate them to being little more
than the firewood for the furnaces of real productivity.
Well
a lot of people, much smarter than us, have been sending that ghost
back to the grave for the last twenty years or so. And the rising
tide of collective thinking about human knowledge, skills, and experience
as the ultimate source of value has finally hit the major corporate
radar screens (aided and abetted by a war for talent and a shrinking
demographic pool). “Okay, I get it,” they say. “I have to do more
than just praise people in my annual report. I actually have to
start managing and developing them like the truly valuable capital
they are. How do I do that? How do I go beyond just more and better
HR?”
There’s
no simple answer, of course. But, we start with some basic beliefs—the
assumptions, perspectives, and habits of thought that represent
a context for any program to pursue a more human-centric strategy.
We draw these beliefs from interviews, dialogs, and readings—but
also from a lot of personal experience. Each of us has had the privilege
to work in some of great institutions that appreciate human values
and spirit and that know better than others how to nurture “the
capital.”
As
is our style, we give you a short and beginning list—to stimulate
your thinking, and initiate the conversation.
1.
Hey, Bean-counters! Human Capital
is a set of terms put together to remind financial types that people
are the critical part of an organization’s makeup and that those
people need to be developed, managed, and also treated with the
respect of at least all the other capital. New and better terms
than “human capital” will continue to evolve.
2.
Measurement Angst Given the complexity,
get used to imperfect metrics; be willing to accept the null set
at least some of the time. Balanced scorecards, talent numbers,
and intellectual capital measurement can be attempted and can even
be helpful. But Heisenberg’s uncertainties must be obeyed, and sometimes
it’s just not worth trying to quantify all that you have. There
are only so many minutes in each day. Use your time wisely.
3.
Managing Means Coaching, Not Just Buying. Everybody wants
to source talent—bring on board people of great accomplishment,
knowledge, and performance capability. But what really matters is
what happens next. The value of human capital begins the moment
that talent joins the team. How they are engaged, treated, and developed
will ultimately determine whether they are productive or not. Every
new job is a new race, and every race is won by the team with not
only the best athletes, but also the best coaches.
4.
Human Capital Investment Is Investment in
Zig-Zag Capability. In the New Economy, with change accelerating
all the time, people may not stay on your neatly defined path, but
they can adapt to all kids of situations. Consider the other capital
sitting around you—the chairs, lights, and even the computer. These
work only with the help of people. Treat your people like chairs
and the only move they’ll make is on to your competitors. Investing
in people is an investment in fluidity, problem-solving, and continuous
reinvention (alongside learning from our mistakes and our guffaws).
5.
Virtual, Cross-Boundary, More Than You Realize.
The arena of managing human capital gets bigger and more slippery
all the time. The game goes beyond your door—you need to consider
the human talent of your suppliers, partners, contractors, allies,
and customers as well as your employees; everybody’s contributing
to the final product now. Cross-boundary also means more virtual;
you can’t plan on seeing or meeting with all the talent you need
to develop. Get used to multi, multi-media approaches.
6.
The Technology Challenge Is Post-Automation.
The easy stuff—conceptually—is automating away brain-numbing work
and managing data. The real value is mostly still to come—when we
discover how to really extend and fulfill human capability with
our machines. Technology as an augmentation and enhancer of, not
substitute for, human capital has begun. But we’re only at the beginning.
7.
I Am Because I Can Vote. The
only way to truly manage human capital is to let it manage itself—or
at least have a big say in how, where, and why it participates in
the organization. Expect and encourage democratic processes and
decision-making throughout the workplace. The days of “I’m the brain,
you’re the legs” are over.
8.
You Win, We Win. In the New Economy,
every job has to be aligned for the benefit of the knowledge worker,
as well as the organization. As obvious as it sounds, lots of managers
still don’t get that. Managing and developing Human Capital is always
a dual mission.
9.
Simply Complex. This human capital
thing is clearly multi-faceted. In addition to “Knowledge capital”
(codified knowledge storable in repositories), and “Intellectual
capital” (proprietary technologies, processes, or ideas that can
be patented or copyright), other kinds of soft capital are in the
mix: “Social Capital” (value potentially produced when people work
together and trust one another);“Relationship capital” (value potentially
created on the basis of collaborative and distinctive exchanges);
and even “Emotional Capital” (value potentially produced by personal
engagement, meaning, commitment, or aspiration). There will be more
to come, and more to understand.
10.
Honoring Performance, but Also Thinking,
Spirit, and Noble Aspirations. Everyone needs to be productive
and accountable; but the game has grown beyond products, results,
and deadlines. Innovation demands reflection and time for “walking
and thinking”; commitment and engagement demand aligning not only
objectives, but meaning in the workplace; and stretching goals cannot
ignore fundamental human feelings of most everyone—wanting not only
to do well, but also to do good, make oneself better while also
making the world a better place. Not for profits become more like
businesses and businesses become more like not for profits. Embrace
the blur.
#
# #
At
the time this article was published, Brook Manville was publisher
of LiNE Zine and the Chief Learning Officer of Saba. Marcia Conner
was editor in chief of LiNE Zine. Find more of her work at www.marciaconner.com.